Best prices Special offers for members of the PWE book club The cheapest delivery
Dr hab. Aleksander Maziarz
ORCID: 0000-0002-0482-5400

Dr hab. Aleksander Maziarz, prof. ALK

Associate Professor at the Department of Administrative and Public Economic Law at Kozminski University, attorney, member of the programme board of the Institute of Legislation and Parliamentary Work of the Supreme Bar Council.

 
DOI: 10.33226/0137-5490.2024.5.4
JEL: K21

The article analyses the provisions introduced into the Spatial Planning and Development Act regulating the new planning instrument known as the Municipal Master Plan. This instrument replaces the controversial solution of mandatory adoption of a non-binding study of spatial conditions and development directions in each municipality, the findings of which were binding when preparing local spatial development plans. The absence of the requirement to adopt local plans often resulted in specific property development being determined in the building permit decision. The new solutions bring about a significant change, as the provisions of the Municipal Master Plan are to be binding both when developing local plans and when issuing building permit decisions. The aim of the article is to examine whether these new solutions will contribute to ensuring spatial order within municipalities.

Keywords: Municipal General Plan; Building Conditions Permit; spatial order
DOI: 10.33226/0137-5490.2022.11.2
JEL: K21

The article analyzes the provisions of the amendment to the Act — Construction Law and the Act on spatial planning and development. In particular, the article analyzes provisions on the new category of construction facilities introduced — detached houses, no more than two-story single-family residential buildings with a building area of up to 70 m2. First of all, the it is assesses whether the new solutions will contribute to the acceleration and informalisation of the administrative procedure granting consent for the realization of such buildings.

Keywords: notification of construction works; decision on development conditions
DOI: 10.33226/0137-5490.2020.1.1
JEL: K21

The article analyzes the EU competition rules in terms of achieving the objectives related to environmental protection. Aim of the research is to determine whether the EU legislator has specified which of the above-mentioned goals outweigh one over other or whether these goals are equivalent. The article also examines how objectives related to environmental protection, which do not have an economic dimension, can be combined with, for example, the premises of individual exemption from the prohibition of agreements restricting competition, which have an economic dimension.

Keywords: environmental protection; competition rules; exemption from the prohibition of restrictive agreements