Best prices Special offers for members of the PWE book club The cheapest delivery
DOI: 10.33226/1231-7853.2025.8.5
JEL: M31, Q56, D12, Q01, M14, O57

Eco-labels and consumer trust: How Gen Z in Poland and India respond to green certifications and their impact on purchase decisions

This study examines how eco-labels shape consumer trust and purchase intentions among Generation Z in Poland and India – two contexts that differ markedly in regulatory oversight and market conditions. Using a cross-sectional online survey (N = 167; Poland: 82, India: 85) based on a non-probability convenience sample of university students and early-career adults, we measured awareness, trust and purchase intention with validated items and analysed between-country differences with independent-samples t-tests and chi-square tests (effect sizes and 95% CIs reported). Brief qualitative insights from open ended responses were used to contextualise quantitative patterns. Results indicate higher eco-label awareness and trust in Poland, consistent with EU credibility and clearer certification, while Indian respondents report lower trust and greater price sensitivity linked to information gaps, affordability/availability constraints and scepticism about monitoring. The findings, positioned against recent literature, suggest practical steps for regulators and marketers – improving transparency and communication of certification, strengthening education and label clarity, and tailoring pricing/distribution to local constraints – while acknowledging limitations related to sampling and self-reports and outlining directions for broader, representative follow-ups.

Keywords: eco-labels; consumer trust; Generation Z; sustainable consumption; green certifications

References

References/Bibliografia

Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.

Biswas, A., & Roy, M. (2022). Green products: An exploratory study on the consumer behaviour in emerging economies of the East. Journal of Cleaner Production, 333, 130030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130030

Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301

Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Deloitte. (2021). Sustainability in India: Consumer perception and behaviour. Deloitte Insights. https://www2.deloitte.com

Delmas, M. A., & Grant, L. E. (2014). Eco-labeling strategies and price-premium: The wine industry puzzle. Business & Society, 53(1), 6–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650310362254

European Commission. (2023). EU Ecolabel facts and figures. Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018, November). ‘True Gen’: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for-companies

Grunert, K. G., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2014). Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy, 44, 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.001

Grunert, K. G., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2021). Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy, 101, 102096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102096

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014

Liobikienė, G., & Bernatonienė, J. (2022). Why determinants of green purchase behaviour differ across countries? A cross-national comparison of Lithuania and Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 378, 134589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134589

McHugh, M. L. (2013). The chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica, 23(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.018

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change [MoEFCC]. (2024, October 4). Ecomark Rules, 2024 notified (Press Information Bureau release). Government of India. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2061878

Mohan, G., Seuring, S., & Schneider, C. (2022). Barriers to sustainable consumption in emerging markets: A consumer perspective. Sustainable Development, 30(3), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2243

Nguyen, T. N., Lobo, A., & Greenland, S. (2020). Pro-environmental purchase behaviour: The role of consumers’ biospheric values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102121

Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231

Rahman, I., Chen, H., & Reynolds, D. (2020). Evidence of green signaling in green hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 85, 102444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102444

Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175

Taherdoost, H. (2021). Data collection methods and tools for research: A step-by-step guide to choose data collection technique for academic and business research projects. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 10(1), 10–38.

Taufique, K. M. R., & Vocino, A. (2021). The influence of eco-label knowledge and trust on pro-environmental consumer behaviour in an emerging market. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 29(5), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2020.1711873

Testa, F., Iraldo, F., Vaccari, A., & Ferrari, E. (2020). Why eco-labels can be effective marketing tools: Evidence from a study on Italian consumers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2380

Thøgersen, J. (2022). Consumer decision-making with eco-labels. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 101343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101343

Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioural intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3

Wang, X., Du, Y., Liu, Y., & Wang, S. (2022). Telling you more fluently: Effect of the joint presentation of eco-label information on consumers’ purchase intention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013713

Article price
5.00
Price of the magazine number
19.00