Best prices Special offers for members of the PWE book club The cheapest delivery
DOI: 10.33226/0137-5490.2026.8.1
JEL: K21
Grzegorz Materna ORCID: 0000-0001-9558-1140 , e-mail: g_materna|wp.pl| |g_materna|wp.pl

EU competition law enforcement in digital markets – reasons for a more centralized approach

The current system of decentralized enforcement of Art. 101 and 102 TFEU sets up a flexible system of parallel enforcement competences of the European Commission and National Competition Authorities. This article discusses the current phenomenon of increasing NCA activity in the field of competition enforcement against EU-wide practices implemented by global market players operating in the digital environment. NCAs’ overactivity in this field leads to multiplication of legal investigations and raises legitimate questions of the effectiveness of competition enforcement, as well as predictability and proportionality. Based on such arguments, the article suggests to introduce a more centralized, consistent approach in reference to EU-wide infringements and, complementarily, to reform fining rules, which should ensure proportionality of fines for such competition restrictions.

Download article
Keywords: competition law; Regulation 1/2003; EC; NCA; ECN (prawo konkurencji; rozporządzenie 1/2003; Komisja Europejska; NCA; ECN)

References

References/Bibliografia

Błachucki, M. (2019). Ponadnarodowe sieci organów administracji publicznej oraz ich wpływ na krajowy porządek prawny (na przykładzie ponadnarodowych sieci organów ochrony konkurencji). Wydawnictwo INP PAN.

Brammer, B. (2005). Concurrent jurisdiction under Regulation 1/2003 and the issue of case allocation. Common Market Law Review, 42(5), 1383–1424. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2005041

Cipolla, G. (2015). Hotel online booking sector: The commitments of ‘booking’ and the most favored nation clauses. A case conducted in cooperation with other national competition authorities. Rivista Italiana di Antitrust, 2(3).

Colangelo, M. (2017). Parity clauses and competition law in digital marketplaces: The case of online hotel booking get access arrow. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 8(1).

Dobosz, K. (2018). Jednolitość stosowania prawa konkurencji Unii Europejskiej przez organy i sądy państw członkowskich. Wolters Kluwer.

Gerber, D. J., & Cassinis, P. (2006). The “modernization” of European Community competition law: Achieving consistency in enforcement: Part 1. European Competition Law Review, 27(1).

Gilliams, H. (2014). Proportionality of EU competition fines: Proposal for a principled discussion. World Competition, 37(4).

Kowalik-Bańczyk, K. (2024). In A. Jurkowska-Gomułka, & A. Piszcz (Eds.), System Prawa Unii Europejskiej. Tom 9. Prawo konkurencji. C.H.Beck.

Letta, E. (2024, April). Much more than a market – speed, security, solidarity. Empowering the Single Market to deliver a sustainable future and prosperity for all EU Citizens.

Nettesheim, M., & Thomas. S. (2025). Extraterritorial administrative jurisdiction in public international law – The antitrust perspective. Zeitschrift für Wettbewerbsrecht (ZWeR), 23(4), 389–429. https://doi.org/10.15375/zwer-2025-0403

Siragusa, M. (1999). A critical review of the White Paper on the reform of the EC competition law enforcement rules. Fordham International Law Journal, 23(4).

Whish, R., & Bailey, D. (2021). Competition Law (10th edition). Oxford.

Wils, W. P. J. (2004). The reform of competition law enforcement – Will it work? FIDE Dublin 2004 Community Report.

Wils, W. P. J. (2023). Regulation 1/2003: An assessment after twenty years. World Competition, 46(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=4268365

Article price
5.00 €
Price of the magazine number
19.00 €
Subscription
225.00 €
180.00 €
Lowest price in last 30 days: 180.00 €
get subscription