The subject of this article is an analysis of the relationship between the protection of the welfare of the child and relief from the return of family allowance that has been unduly collected. Reliefs in the repayment of unduly collected family benefit (cancellation, deferral, installment) are possible only when there are particularly justified circumstances regarding the situation of the family. The purpose of the article is to verify the hypothesis that there is no place (in the system of repayment of family benefits unduly collected) for the examination of the situation of the child (the main beneficiary of family benefits) and for the direct protection of his welfare. In her paper, the author analyzes whether the legislator has properly protected the child and his needs, as well as whether it has allowed the authorities to have a chance to take into account the needs not of the child's family, but of the child himself, when deciding to grant relief from the reimbursement of family allowance.

The subject of the article is the analysis the new legal  regulations on allegation in an administrative  enforcement proceedings after the changes introduced  by the Amendment Act of September 11, 2019. The  aim of the article is to verify the amendment in terms  from the perspective of the designer, who wanted to  increase the effectiveness of the enforcement  proceedings in considering the allegations, secure the  obligated party and facilitate the work of the  enforcement authority and the creditor. The main  manifestation of this is the fact that the burden of  considering the allegations from July 30, 2020 is on the  creditor. In their article, the authors examine, whether  the amendment actually had a positive impact on the  improvement of the procedure of making allegations.