Best prices Special offers for members of the PWE book club The cheapest delivery
DOI: 10.33226/0137-5490.2020.9.6
JEL: K21, K24

Regulation of unfair and non-transparent business-to-platform trading practices — the importance of antimonopoly law

The P2B Regulation lays down the principles of fair and transparent treatment of business users using online platforms (online intermediation services). This legal act, addressing many anti-trust issues, is the first step towards creating ex ante regulatory instruments for online platforms. To contribute to the discussion on the need and possible shape of online platforms regulation, the aim of the research is: (i) to indicate the interaction between the P2B Regulation and antitrust law, with particular emphasis on the importance of antitrust law for the future ex ante regulation of large online platforms, as well as (ii) to determine the desired standard of intervention, including an effective enforcement mechanism, with regard to harmful practices of online platform operators (i.e. entrepreneurs which provide online intermediation services on the platform) identified on the basis of the P2B Regulation. Arguments for the legitimacy of public intervention in the operation of online platform operators in the case of: (i) significant bargaining power of the online platform operator over business users and (ii) damage to the public interest will be elaborated.

Download article
Keywords: P2B Regulation; online platforms; fairness; transparency; antimonopoly law

References

Bibliografia/References

Literatura/Literature

Allott, A. N. (1980). The limits of law. London: Butterworths.

Autoridade da Concorrencia (2019). Digital ecosystems, Big Data and Algorithms. Lizbona: Autoridade da Concorrencia.

Brin, S., Page, L. (1998). The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hyper-textual Web Search Engine, http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html (2.07.2020).

Caillaud, B., Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken & Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service Providers. The RAND Journal of Economics, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/1593720

Ecosyr (2017). Business-to-Business relations in the online platform environment. Bruksela: Komisja Europejska.

Evans, D. S., Schmalensee, R. (2007). The Industrial Organization of Markets with Two-Sided Platforms, Competition Policy International, 3(1).

Ezrachi, A., Stucke, M. E. (2016). Virtual Competition: The Promise and Perils of the Algorithm-Driven Economy. Cambridge, Londyn: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674973336

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Höppner, T., Schulz, A. (2019). Die EU-Verordnung 2019/1150 für Fairness und Transparenz von Online-Vermittlungsdiensten („P2B-Verordnung”). Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 49.

Komisja Europejska (2018). Wniosek rozporządzenia w sprawie propagowania sprawiedliwości i przejrzystości dla użytkowników biznesowych korzystających z usług pośrednictwa internetowego. Bruksela: Komisja Europejska.

Małobęcka-Szwast, I. (2018). Naruszenie prawa ochrony danych osobowych jako nadużycie pozycji dominującej? Postępowanie Bundeskartellamt przeciwko Facebookowi. internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.7172/ikar

Mazur, J., Szmigielski, A. (2018). Czy działalność Ubera jest usługą społeczeństwa informacyjnego? Europejski Przegląd Sądowy, (5).

OECD (2019). An Introduction to Online Platforms and their Role in the Digital Transformation. Paryż: OECD.

Parlament Europejski (2018). Sprawozdanie w sprawie wniosku dotyczącego rozporządzenia Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady w sprawie propagowania sprawiedliwości i przejrzystości dla użytkowników biznesowych korzystających z usług pośrednictwa internetowego. Bruksela: Parlament Europejski.

Polley, R., Pesch, T. (2019). Die P2B-Verordnung und ihre Bedeutung für das Kartellrecht. Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb, 69(10).

Shengli, L., Yipeng, L, Subhajyoti, B. (2010). Network effects in online two-sided market platforms: A research note. Decision Support Systems, 49.

Streel, A. de (2018). Online Intermediation Platforms and Fairness: An Assessment of the Recent Commission Proposal. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3248723 (2.07.2020). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3248723

Twigg-Flesner, Ch. (2018). The EU's Proposals for Regulating B2B Relationships on Online Platforms — Transparency, Fairness and Beyond. Journal of European Consumer and Markets Law, (6), https://ssrn.com/abstract=3253115 (2.07.2020).

Strony internetowe/Websites

https://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/en/communiques-de-presse/31-january-2019-online-advertising-directory-enquiry-services-0 (2.07.2020).

https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12418-Digital-Services-Act-package-ex-ante-regulatory-instrument-of-very-large-online-platforms-acting-as-gatekeepers (2.07.2020).

https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Meldung/DE/Pressemitteilungen/2019/17_07_2019_Amazon.html (2.07.2020).

https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidung/EN/Fallberichte/Missbrauchsaufsicht/2019/B2-88-18. pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=5 (2.07.2020).

https://www.autoritedelaconcurrence.fr/fr/communiques-de-presse/lautorite-sanctionne-google-hauteur-de-150-meu-pour-abus-de-position (2.07.2020).

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_4291 (2.07.2020).

Article price
4.00
Journal of Business Law 9/2020
15.00
As file to download
15.00
Subscription
197.00 €
158.00
Lowest price in last 30 days: 156.00
get subscription