Best prices Special offers for members of the PWE book club The cheapest delivery
Dr Agnieszka Zwolińska
ORCID: 0000-0002-8369-3089

Assistant professor at the Depart-ment of Labour Law and Social Policy Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw; attorney-at-law, currently assistant specialist for jurisprudence at the La-bour and Social Security Chamber, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland.

 
DOI: 10.33226/0032-6186.2026.3.10
JEL: K31

The judgment in the Ineo Infracom case, C-249/24, repre­sents a subsequent statement by the CJEU on the EU con­cept of ‘collective redundancies”. The Court attempts to clarify the criterion of a substantial change to an essential element of the employment contract for reasons not relat­ed to the worker. The author compares the EU definition with the Polish institution of ‘notice of amendment’, an­ticipating practical difficulties in applying the criterion in question. She advocates resolving any doubts in favour of finding that the employer has a duty to inform and consult workers’ representatives on the contemplated collective redundancies.

Keywords: collective redundancy; unilateral amendment to an employment contract; essential element of an employment contract; significant amendment of an employment contract
DOI: 10.33226/0032-6186.2023.4.3
JEL: K31

The purpose of this article is to answer the question of whether the prerequisite of an employer's liability for damages for discrimination, under the Polish Labour Code, is the failure to perform or improperly perform the duty to prevent discrimination, respectively, whether the prerequisite of an employer's liability for damages for bulling, under the Polish Labour Code, is the failure to perform or improperly perform the duty to prevent bulling. 

Keywords: discrimination; bulling; employer's liability for damages; duty to prevent
DOI: 10.33226/0032-6186.2021.2.7
JEL: K31

The aim of this article is to present and comment on judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered in cases C-620/18 and 626/18 concerning Polish and Hungarian applications to annul Directive 2018/957/EU amending the Posting of Workers Directive.

Keywords: posting of workers; freedom of providing the services; Directive 2018/957/EU
DOI: 10.33226/0032-6186.2021.1.7
JEL: K31

The aim of this article is to present and comment on judgments of the Court of the European Union delivered in cases C-620/18 and 626/18 concerning Polish and Hungarian applications to annul Directive 2018/957/EU amending the Posting of Workers Directive.

Keywords: posting of workers; freedom of providing the services; Directive 2018/957/EU
DOI: 10.33226/0032-6186.2020.7.7
JEL: K31

In the judgement of 23 April 2020 in case C-507/18 the Court of Justice of the EU ruled on the scope of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, possible limitations to the exercise of freedom of expression justified by the prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation, and the right of the association to bring legal proceedings for the enforcement of obligations under that directive.

Keywords: Council Directive 2000/78/EC; prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation; conditions for access to employment; freedom of expression; association; right to bring legal proceeding
DOI: 10.33226/0032-6186.2020.2.9

Przegląd Dzienników Ustaw za 2020 r. od poz. 1 do poz. 150

Keywords:
DOI: 10.33226/0032-6186.2020.1.9

Przegląd Dzienników Ustaw za 2019 r. od poz. 2338 do poz. 2566

Keywords: