At the edge of informality: Determinants of openness to undeclared and under-declared work in the European Union
Na granicy szarej strefy: determinanty gotowości do podejmowania pracy całkowicie lub częściowo nierejestrowanej w Unii Europejskiej
This study examines factors associated with openness to undeclared and under-declared work among dependent employees in the European Union, focusing on individuals who have not reported recent engagement in informal employment. Using Special Eurobarometer 92.1 microdata and logistic regression models, it adopts a preventive perspective on potential vulnerability to informality. The analysis shows that openness is associated with socio-demographic characteristics, including age, gender, household composition and social class, as well as employment context, prior exposure to informal practices, tax morale, perceived detection risk and expected sanctions. The results also indicate that fully undeclared and under-declared work should not be treated as interchangeable, as they are associated with partly distinct individual, household and enforcement-related patterns. In addition, item nonresponse suggests possible concealed familiarity with informality, although robustness checks indicate that alternative codings do not materially change the results. While pension outcomes are not directly estimated, the findings are relevant to debates on social protection, as openness to informal employment may indicate vulnerability to future contribution gaps if it translates into actual undeclared or under-declared work. By highlighting factors associated with early-stage openness to informality, the study contributes to discussions on labour market formalisation and preventive policy interventions aimed at supporting formal employment and long-term income security.
Badanie analizuje determinanty gotowości pracowników najemnych w Unii Europejskiej do podejmowania pracy nierejestrowanej i częściowo nierejestrowanej. Koncentruje się na osobach, które nie deklarowały wykonywania pracy nieformalnej w ciągu ostatnich 12 miesięcy. W analizie wykorzystano dane jednostkowe Special Eurobarometer 92.1 oraz modele regresji logistycznej. Wyniki wskazują, że gotowość do podejmowania pracy nieformalnej jest związana z takimi cechami jak wiek, płeć, skład gospodarstwa domowego i klasa społeczna. Istotne znaczenie mają też kontekst zatrudnienia, wcześniejszy kontakt z praktykami nieformalnymi, morale podatkowe, postrzegane ryzyko wykrycia oraz oczekiwane sankcje. Wyniki pokazują także, że pracy całkowicie nierejestrowanej i częściowo nierejestrowanej nie należy traktować jako zjawisk tożsamych. Wiążą się one bowiem z częściowo odmiennymi cechami indywidualnymi, gospodarstwa domowego oraz egzekwowaniem prawa. Badanie sugeruje możliwość ukrywanej znajomości praktyk nieformalnych, a testy odporności wskazują, że alternatywne sposoby kodowania odpowiedzi nie wpływają istotnie na uzyskane wyniki. Badanie wnosi wkład do dyskusji nad formalizacją rynku pracy oraz prewencyjnymi działaniami polityki publicznej wspierającymi zatrudnienie formalne i długookresowe bezpieczeństwo dochodowe. Wskazując czynniki związane z gotowością do wejścia w szarą strefę, dostarcza wiedzy przydatnej w projektowaniu działań zapobiegających rozwojowi zatrudnienia nieformalnego.
Bibliografia
References/Bibliografia
Allingham, M. (1999). Rational choice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Arendt, L., Grabowski, W., & Kukulak-Dolata, I. (2020). County-level patterns of undeclared work: An empirical analysis of a highly diversified region in the European Union. Social Indicators Research, 149(1), 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02243-4
Benjamin, N., Beegle, K., Recanatini, F., & Santini, M. (2014). Informal economy and the World Bank (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6888). World Bank.
Bentolila, S., Dolado, J. J., & Jimeno, J. F. (2020). Dual labour markets revisited. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.502
Buchholtz, S., Chłoń-Domińczak, A., & Góra, M. (2019). The Polish NDC scheme: Success in the face of adversity (Social Protection Discussion Paper Series). World Bank.
Carcillo, S., Fernandez, R., Konigs, S., & Minea, A. (2015). NEET youth in the aftermath of the crisis: Challenges and policies. OECD.
Cummings, R. G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., McKee, M., & Torgler, B. (2009). Tax morale affects tax compliance: Evidence from surveys and an artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(3), 447–457.
European Commission. (2007). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Stepping up the fight against undeclared work (COM(2007) 628 final).
European Commission. (2017). An evaluation of the scale of undeclared work in the European Union and its structural determinants: Estimates using the Labour Input Method. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
European Commission. (2020). Undeclared work in the European Union. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
European Labour Authority. (2022). Effective penalty measures for tackling undeclared work, including through cost-effective administrative actions. https://www.ela.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2022-09/UDW-Learning-resource-paper-TRW-Effective-penalty-measures-2022-EN.pdf
European Labour Authority. (2023). Extent of undeclared work in the European Union. https://www.ela.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2023-03/ Study-on-the-extent-of-undeclared-work-in-the-EU.pdf
EurWORK. (2020). Undeclared work. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. https://www.eurofound. europa.eu/observatories/eurwork/industrial-relations-dictionary/undeclared-work
Gërxhani, K. (2004). Tax evasion in transition: Outcome of an institutional clash? Testing Feige’s conjecture in Albania. European Economic Review, 48(4), 729–745.
Gërxhani, K., & Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2013). The effect of education on informal sector participation in a post-communist country. European Sociological Review, 29(3), 464–476.
Gormus, A. (2017). The micro determinants of informal youth employment in Turkey. In K. Selcuk, A. Orhan, & M. C. Gozen (Eds.), Unregistered employment (pp. 157–169). IJOPEC Publication.
Greif, A. (2005). Commitment, coercion, and markets: The nature and dynamics of institutions supporting exchange. In C. Ménard & M. M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of new institutional economics (pp. 727–786). Springer.
Hanousek, J., & Palda, F. (2004). Quality of government services and the civic duty to pay taxes in the Czech and Slovak Republics, and other transition countries. Kyklos, 57(2), 237–252.
Horodnic, I. A., & Williams, C. C. (2019). Tackling undeclared work in the European Union: Beyond the rational economic actor approach. Policy Studies, 43(1), 21–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1649384
Medina, L., & Schneider, F. (2019). Shedding light on the shadow economy: A global database and the interaction with the official one (CESifo Working Paper No. 7981).
Medina, L., & Schneider, F. (2018). Shadow economies around the world: What did we learn over the last 20 years? International Monetary Fund.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Renooy, P. H. (1990). The informal economy: Meaning, measurement and social significance. Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap.
Schneider, F., Buehn, A., & Montenegro, C. E. (2010). New estimates for the shadow economies all over the world. International Economic Journal, 24(4), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2010.525974
Shehu, E., & Nilsson, B. (2014). Informal employment among youth: Evidence from 20 school-to-work transition surveys. International Labour Office.
Solon, G., Haider, S. J., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). What are we weighting for? Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 301–316. https://doi. org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.301
Štulhofer, A., & Rimac, I. (2002). Opportunism, institutions and moral costs: The socio-cultural dimension of the underground economy in Croatia 1995–1999 (Occasional Paper Series No. 6(14)).
Torgler, B., & Schneider, F. (2007). Shadow economy, tax morale, governance and institutional quality: A panel analysis (IZA Discussion Paper No. 2563).
Williams, C. C., & Horodnic, I. A. (2015). Explaining and tackling envelope wages in the Baltic Sea region: An institutional perspective. Baltic Journal of Management, 10(3), 295–312.
Williams, C. C., & Horodnic, I. A. (2020). Horizon scanning: Early warning signals of future trends in undeclared work. European Platform Tackling Undeclared Work.
Williams, C. C., & Horodnic, I. A. (2020a). Trends in the undeclared economy and policy approaches: Evidence from the 2007, 2013 and 2019 Eurobarometer surveys. Publications Office of the European Union.
Williams, C. C., & Öz-Yalaman, G. (2021). Re-theorising participation in undeclared work in the European Union: Lessons from a 2019 Eurobarometer survey. European Societies, 23(3), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2021.1887915