A capital company has judicial capacity and procedural capacity, which means that it can act as a party in civil proceedings, including enforcement proceedings. A capital company as a legal entity acts through its organs. The body authorized to represent the company also acts for the company in enforcement proceedings. The purpose of this study is to show the principles of representation of capital companies in enforcement proceedings, with particular attention to possible differences arising from the specifics of these proceedings. In the course of the research, such issues were analysed as: the manner of representation of the company by the management board or board of directors, including the consequences of the non-simultaneous action of the hubs of the body obliged to act jointly and the action of a cadre body, the representation of the company by a body other than the management board or board of directors in a dispute with a member of the management board or a director, as well as the consequences of the performance of a legal act and an act in enforcement proceedings by a person acting as a body, but without authority or acting beyond its scope. After conducting the research, the conclusion was reached that the specifics of enforcement proceedings do not fundamentally affect the rules of representation of a capital company by bodies. Differences are revealed, however, with regard to the consequences of acting for the company by a so-called false authority, as the provisions of the National Court Register Law providing for the protection of third parties acting in confidence in the content of the entry in the register will not apply to the authorities conducting enforcement proceedings.