The fashion industry has for some years been undergoing a slow evolution towards more sustainable practices. In recent times both law and technology, in particular, connected technology have been acting as catalysts towards this goal. These shifts are widely embraced by many of today's key consumers. But a paradigm shift in any industry, especially one that mixes technology and sustainability, triggers inevitable legal consequences which must be examined and resolved. The aim of this article is to examine the impact of consumer trends, sustainability and the various pieces of legislation identified in the text on the business strategies of fashion brands in the post-COVID fashion revolution era, in order to identify effective adaptation of legislative measures that will allow them to maintain their position in the market and improve their financial performance. It has been claimed that customers crave fashion, but they have ecological concerns and a conscientious approach to consumption. Reportedly, they are prepared to buy fewer, better-quality and environmentally friendly products at the higher price these priorities imply. This paper will shed light on the legal externalities, concerns and stimuli towards building a sustainable fashion brand.

The manifestation of the institution of incompatibility of positions in the law of local self-government is, inter alia, 24f par. 2 of the Act of 8 March 1990 on Commune Self-government (u.s.g.). The principles of prevention of corruption in the local government set out in the acts are the subject of numerous critical remarks in the science of law. In particular, the relationship between art. 2 par. 6, art. 4 and art. 6 par. 1 of the Act of 21 August 1997 on Limitation of Conducting Business Activity by Persons Performing Public Functions in relation to art. 24f par. 2 u.s.g. is problematic. Problems also arise from the issue of being members of the management or control and audit authorities as well as proxies of commercial companies with the participation of legal persons of any local government units or entrepreneurs in which such persons participate, by persons indicated in art. 24f par. 2 u.s.g. Indicated specific issues was devoted to this study.