Best prices Special offers for members of the PWE book club The cheapest delivery
Dr Justyna Kania
ORCID: 0000-0002-7123-9858

Doctor in the discipline of legal sciences, assistant at the Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Silesia in Katowice, and secretary at the Research Centre for Law, Design, Fashion, and Advertising.

 
DOI: 10.33226/0137-5490.2026.7.3
JEL: M14, G34, K20

This article examines the evolving legal nature of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the European Union (EU), focusing on the textile, clothing, leather and footwear (TCLF) sector. Analysing legal and policy developments, it argues that the legal architecture of CSR has become pluralistic and hybrid. Once conceived as voluntary conduct beyond legal mandate, CSR is undergoing a “hardening” through which soft-law norms and societal expectations crystallise into binding obligations. Frameworks from legal sociology and regulation studies – legal pluralism, reflexive law, autopoiesis, meta-regulation and the regulatory trilemma – illuminate this shift. The analysis highlights EU initiatives such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive, and national laws (France’s Loi de Vigilance, Germany’s Supply Chain Act) that embed CSR into formal legislation. In the TCLF sector, new rules compel firms to internalise social and environmental responsibilities across their supply chains. This hybrid governance seeks to strengthen accountability while preserving flexibility. CSR in the EU has no single doctrinal source or fixed legal status; it exists at the dynamic interface of hard and soft law across global, regional and national levels, raising key questions about normative coherence and the role of stakeholders in enforcing corporate accountability.

Keywords: CSR; soft law; hard law; TCLF sector; corporate responsibility
DOI: 10.33226/0137-5490.2023.4.3
JEL: K12, K15

The fashion industry has for some years been undergoing a slow evolution towards more sustainable practices. In recent times both law and technology, in particular, connected technology have been acting as catalysts towards this goal. These shifts are widely embraced by many of today's key consumers. But a paradigm shift in any industry, especially one that mixes technology and sustainability, triggers inevitable legal consequences which must be examined and resolved. The aim of this article is to examine the impact of consumer trends, sustainability and the various pieces of legislation identified in the text on the business strategies of fashion brands in the post-COVID fashion revolution era, in order to identify effective adaptation of legislative measures that will allow them to maintain their position in the market and improve their financial performance. It has been claimed that customers crave fashion, but they have ecological concerns and a conscientious approach to consumption. Reportedly, they are prepared to buy fewer, better-quality and environmentally friendly products at the higher price these priorities imply. This paper will shed light on the legal externalities, concerns and stimuli towards building a sustainable fashion brand.

Keywords: Fashion Tech; fashion technology; sustainable fashion; fashion trends; intellectual property; COVID-19