The purpose of the gloss is basically a critical evaluation presented by Supreme Administrative Court to the interpretation art. 37at para. 8 Act of 6 September 2001 – Pharmaceutical Law, which is one of the legal bases for supervising regulated economic activity by the organs of the State Pharmaceutical Inspection. Summons by the State Pharmaceutical Inspection to submit documents by entrepreneur may be based on various legal provisions, which determine the consequences of non-compliance. Keywords: control, inspection, supervision, State Pharmaceutical Inspection, economic activity.

Supreme Administrative Court takes the position that from the provisions of the Act on upbringing in sobriety and counteracting alcoholism, it is not possible to derive a prohibition on the sale of alcoholic beverages by the entrepreneur from the point of sale specified in the permit by electronic means of communication. This view cannot be accepted, first of all, due to the applicable provisions of public and private law, and in particular for the purposes of rationing of the sale of alcoholic beverages. At the same time, from the considerations of the Supreme Administrative Court in the justification of the judgment under review, it appears that its source was primarily the faulty identification of the form of the legal act, which is the form of the sales contract, with the manner in which the buyer chooses a contractor. The purpose of the gloss is to critically address the SAC's interpretation of the legal provisions that form the basis for rationing the sale of alcoholic beverages by an entrepreneur.