Best prices Special offers for members of the PWE book club The cheapest delivery
Dr Agnieszka Zwolińska
ORCID: 0000-0002-8369-3089

Assistant professor at the Department of Labour Law and Social Policy Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw; attorney-at-law, currently assistant specialist for jurisprudence at the Labour and Social Security Chamber, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Poland.

 
DOI: 10.33226/0032-6186.2025.9.9
JEL: K31

The CJEU interpreted Article 3(1) and Article 5(1) of Directive 2008/104/EC on temporary agency work in its judgment of 24 October 2024 in Case C-441/23. This judg­ment continues the CJEU’s previous jurisprudence and, at the same time, inspires a discussion on the construction of the legal relationship of temporary agency work adopted in Polish law.

Keywords: temporary-work agency; user undertaking; temporary agency worker; temporary employment relationship
DOI: 10.33226/0032-6186.2025.3.9
JEL: K31

The CoJ judgements in question address the issue of ensuring the effectiveness of a worker's fundamental right to limit maximum working hours and daily and weekly rest periods by establishing an employer's obligation to record the working time of each worker.

Keywords: working time; worker's fundamental right; employer's duty; working time records